۸۰/۵۰۰۰ Social Development Social Welfare Globalization Family abuse Job Satisfaction social participation
Mehdi Shakori; tahmures shiri; reza ali mohseni
Abstract
The findings of the discourse analysis indicated that the floating indicator of 'social justice in unemployment insurance laws' is based on the central slab of 'targeted welfare system', this slab, the following governing discourse Unemployment Insurance Act (Construction Discourse) in the form of models ...
Read More
The findings of the discourse analysis indicated that the floating indicator of 'social justice in unemployment insurance laws' is based on the central slab of 'targeted welfare system', this slab, the following governing discourse Unemployment Insurance Act (Construction Discourse) in the form of models or core signs, such as 'job creation', 'dual structure of unemployment insurance', 'attitude toward unemployment as a social problem,' 'lack of supportive and comprehensive view' and 'observance of authority justice' Blocking and articulation of this discourse has been shaped around the main dodges. But the floating slab 'Social justice in unemployment insurance laws' in the unemployment insurance plan, based on the central slab of 'comprehensive support policy', is the following dialogue in the text, which has been the moderation of the spiritual government, in the form of major signs. Or models such as 'non-compliance of distributive justice', 'Improving the welfare of the unemployed', 'attitude towards unemployment as macro and ultrasonity', 'planning a framework for the permission of the unemployed', 'providing financial credits in the field of unemployment,' 'reform in the rules And the regulations of unemployment 'and' observance of authority justice ', blocked and around the main signs, formed the meaning of the discourse. Therefore, the results of the discourse analysis indicate that social justice in unemployment insurance laws were not the same in terms of discursive analysis (subjects,
aliakbar tajmazenani; ali sherinabadi
Abstract
Unemployment Insurance Welfare Program in Iran suffers from several problems including financial problems, lengthy procedure of receiving unemployment benefit for some groups of the insured and the slow exit of the unemployed from the situation of benefit dependency, making the evaluation of this program ...
Read More
Unemployment Insurance Welfare Program in Iran suffers from several problems including financial problems, lengthy procedure of receiving unemployment benefit for some groups of the insured and the slow exit of the unemployed from the situation of benefit dependency, making the evaluation of this program a necessity. The research which underlies the present paper has applied three kinds of evaluations, namely: need based evaluation, process evaluation, and impact evaluation. Using a qualitative method, in-depth interviews have been carried out with both the unemployment benefit recipients as well as the unemployment insurance staff while related administrative documents and evidence have been reviewed and analyzed. An analysis of the data reveals nine main themes which represent the most important challenges of the program, which are as follows: lengthy administrative process, lack of a comprehensive coverage of all eligible people, abuse of the program (welfare fraud), coercion and abuse by employers, imbalance between the incoming and the outgoing numbers of unemployed people (to and from the unemployment insurance fund), weak re-employment, inconsistency in administrative data and statistics, welfare dependency, and lack of coverage for all needs of the unemployed.
