Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Azad university
2 2. Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University ,Tehran, Iran
3 Academic staff of Central Azad University of Tehran
Abstract
The findings of the discourse analysis indicated that the floating indicator of 'social justice in unemployment insurance laws' is based on the central slab of 'targeted welfare system', this slab, the following governing discourse Unemployment Insurance Act (Construction Discourse) in the form of models or core signs, such as 'job creation', 'dual structure of unemployment insurance', 'attitude toward unemployment as a social problem,' 'lack of supportive and comprehensive view' and 'observance of authority justice' Blocking and articulation of this discourse has been shaped around the main dodges. But the floating slab 'Social justice in unemployment insurance laws' in the unemployment insurance plan, based on the central slab of 'comprehensive support policy', is the following dialogue in the text, which has been the moderation of the spiritual government, in the form of major signs. Or models such as 'non-compliance of distributive justice', 'Improving the welfare of the unemployed', 'attitude towards unemployment as macro and ultrasonity', 'planning a framework for the permission of the unemployed', 'providing financial credits in the field of unemployment,' 'reform in the rules And the regulations of unemployment 'and' observance of authority justice ', blocked and around the main signs, formed the meaning of the discourse. Therefore, the results of the discourse analysis indicate that social justice in unemployment insurance laws were not the same in terms of discursive analysis (subjects,
Keywords
Main Subjects
- Barry, Brian. (1989). Theories of Justice, London. School of Economics and Political Sciences.
- Mojtabavi Naini, Maziar. (1993). Dictionary of labor and social welfare terms with the English and French equivalents. Tehran. Labor and Social Security Institute.
- Phillips, Louise, and Jorgensen, Marianne. (2002). Discorse Analysis as Theory and Method. California. sege publications.
)