۸۰/۵۰۰۰ Social Development Social Welfare Globalization Family abuse Job Satisfaction social participation
Mehdi Shakori; tahmures shiri; reza ali mohseni
Abstract
The findings of the discourse analysis indicated that the floating indicator of 'social justice in unemployment insurance laws' is based on the central slab of 'targeted welfare system', this slab, the following governing discourse Unemployment Insurance Act (Construction Discourse) in the form of models ...
Read More
The findings of the discourse analysis indicated that the floating indicator of 'social justice in unemployment insurance laws' is based on the central slab of 'targeted welfare system', this slab, the following governing discourse Unemployment Insurance Act (Construction Discourse) in the form of models or core signs, such as 'job creation', 'dual structure of unemployment insurance', 'attitude toward unemployment as a social problem,' 'lack of supportive and comprehensive view' and 'observance of authority justice' Blocking and articulation of this discourse has been shaped around the main dodges. But the floating slab 'Social justice in unemployment insurance laws' in the unemployment insurance plan, based on the central slab of 'comprehensive support policy', is the following dialogue in the text, which has been the moderation of the spiritual government, in the form of major signs. Or models such as 'non-compliance of distributive justice', 'Improving the welfare of the unemployed', 'attitude towards unemployment as macro and ultrasonity', 'planning a framework for the permission of the unemployed', 'providing financial credits in the field of unemployment,' 'reform in the rules And the regulations of unemployment 'and' observance of authority justice ', blocked and around the main signs, formed the meaning of the discourse. Therefore, the results of the discourse analysis indicate that social justice in unemployment insurance laws were not the same in terms of discursive analysis (subjects,
bahareh hagihosseni; ezatallah samaram
Abstract
In this article, the reformist discourse of Khatami's Administration is analyzed and the status of poverty alleviation is designated. The authors presume that discourses construct realities, so discourse analysis is important for tracing the roots of any phenomena. Therefore, the authors have examined ...
Read More
In this article, the reformist discourse of Khatami's Administration is analyzed and the status of poverty alleviation is designated. The authors presume that discourses construct realities, so discourse analysis is important for tracing the roots of any phenomena. Therefore, the authors have examined the related texts (including the selected speeches and development plans) by using Laclau and Mouffe's discourse theory and Fairclaugh's Critical Discourse Analysis. Findings indicate that in the reformist discourse of Khatami's Administration, "political development" was the master signifier and other signifiers, including poverty alleviation, gained their final meaning as the result of subjection to it. In other words, poverty alleviation was postponed until the achievement of political development. According to the theoretical findings, the reformist discourse was constituted by articulating the signifiers of liberalism discourse and the Islamic Revolution meta-discourse. As poverty alleviation is not the master signifier in liberalism -it is in fact a by-product of political and economic development- the reality which is produced by this discourse does not pay attention to poverty alleviation as a main issue and marginalizes it.
