Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

The study, focusing on the Harandi neighborhood in Tehran, is a rummage of poverty and urban social issues. Based on the autobiographical ethnographic method, the data are collected through observation, interviews, personal archives, interviews published by civil activists, and documentary methods (from the novel), organized in the form of two major narratives. HarandiNeighbourhood is an extreme example that clearly illustrates the relationship between social issues and urban poverty, and for this reason, it has been selected as an example. Findings indicate very low social monitoring, lack of ownership of space, lack of social ties between residents of the neighborhood and other communities, provision of grounds for legislation and regulation, the formation of symbolic territories by the affected groups, weak support of the government towards the communities living in the neighborhood, socialization among some small groups and high social exclusion. Accordingly, the interpenetration of these factors with urban spaces at the district, requires that social policy be sensitive to the socio-economic-political context and take into account the conditions of all the groups, that through quantitative and up-down approaches will not be possible.

Keywords

-  پروین، ستار و درویشی‌فرد، علی‌اصغر. (1394)، خُرده فرهنگ فقر و آسیب‌های اجتماعی در محلات شهری (مطالعة موردی محلة هرندی). مجله برنامه‌ریزی رفاه و توسعه اجتماعی. دوره 6، شماره 23: 51-90.
-  عباس‌زاده، محمد. (1391)، تاملی بر اعتبار و پایایی در تحقیقات کیفی. فصلنامه جامعه‌شناسی کاربردی. سال بیستم، شماره 1: 19-34.
-  صدوقی، مجید. (1387)، معیارهای ویژه ارزیابی پژوهش کیفی. فصلنامه روش‌شناسی علوم انسانی. سال 14، شماره 56: 55-72.
 
-   Boylorn, R. M. (2008). “Everyday Life”. In Given, Lisa. M. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Volume 1&2. London: Sage.
-   Gottfredson, M. R. & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: StanfordUniversity Press.
-   Guba, Egon. G. (1981). “Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries”. Educational Technology Research and Development, (29/2), 75-91.
-   Harvey, David, and Michael H. Reed. (1996). “The Culture of Poverty: An Ideological Analysis”. Sociological Perspectives, (39/4), 465-496.
-   Lewis, Oscar. (1966). La Vida: a Puerto Rican Family in the Culture of Poverty. New York: Random House.
-   Madill, A., Jordan, A. And Shirley, C. (2000). “Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies”. British Journal of Psychology, (91/1), 1-20.
-   Reed-Danahay, D.E. (Ed). (1997). Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the Self and the Social. Oxford: Berg.
-   Schingaro, Nicola. (2014). “The Reversal of Lifelong Labeling: An Autoethnography”. Deviant Behavior, (35/9), 703–726.
-   Squires, Gregory D. and Charis E. Kubrin. (2005). “Privileged Places: Race, Uneven Development, and the Geography of Opportunity in Urban America.” Urban Studies (42/1), 47-68.
-   Suttles, Gerald D. (1968). The Social Order of the Slum: Ethnicity and Territory in the Inner City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-   Toby, Jackson. (1957). “Social disorganization and stake in conformity: Complementary factors in the predatory behavior of hoodlums”. 48 J.Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 12 (1957-1958).