Application of Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) in Identifying the Function of the Pension Fund Organization (PFO) in the Structure of Iranian Economy

Banouei, Ali Asghar; MOHAGERI, PARESA; Javadi Pashaki, Kurosh; Khaleghi, Pegah; Hosseini, Seyyed Mohammad Amin

doi:10.22054/qjsd.2021.52716.1995

Application of Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) in Identifying the Function of the Pension Fund Organization (PFO) in the Structure of Iranian Economy

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Ali Asghar Banouei ¹

PARESA MOHAGERI ²

kurosh Javadi Pashaki ³

Pegah Khaleghi ⁴

Seyyed Mohammad Amin Hosseini ⁵

¹ Development and planning, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba'i university

² Faculty of Economics Allameh Tabataba'i.

³ Statistical Center of iran

⁴ Post graduate Student, Faculty of Economy, University of Tehran

⁵ Post graduate Student, Faculty of Economy, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran

https://doi.org/10.22054/qjsd.2021.52716.1995

Abstract

In this article two functions of Pension Fund Organization (PFO) are highlighted in the framework of Social Accounting Matrix (SAM). First is the identification of mobilizing resources (deductions) from factor income to allocation and finally to inter-institutional income transfers. Second is the measurement of the role of PFO in increasing production, factor income (GDP) and institutional income using two conventional and new multipliers. The difference between the two is taken as the role of PFO in the structure of economy. The above two functions raise the following two questions: one- Could the new classification be used to identify the function of PFO in channelizing resources (deductions) in the structure of Iranian economy? Two- What is the share of PFO to production, GDP and domestic institutional income? Using the newly constructed 1395 SAM, the overall results are two folds: First- the share of PFO in mobilizing resources is 65.4% and the share of other institutions is 34.6%. Second- The respective share of PFO in production, GDP and institutional incomes are 0.3, 0.34 and 1.04%.

Keywords

"Social Accounting Matrix (SAM)"

"Pension Fund Organization (PFO)"

"Allocation Matrix"

"Transfers Matrix"

"Income of Production Factors"

بانک مرکزی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. (۱۳۹۸)، حساب‌های ملی ایران: حساب تولید تا حساب مالی به تفکیک بخش‌های نهادی، اداره حساب‌های اقتصادی، معاونت اقتصادی.
بانوئی، علی اصغر. (۱۳۸۰)، «نقش روش حسابداری لئونتیف به عنوان پل ارتباطی دیدگاه‌های رشدمحور و انسان‌محور»، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های اقتصادی ایران، شماره ۹: 89-126.
بانوئی، علی اصغر و عرب مازار یزدی، علی. (۱۳۸۳)، «اهمیت مقوله توزیع درآمد و ابعاد آن در ماتریس حسابداری اجتماعی»، فصلنامه اقتصاد و جامعه، شماره ۲: 160-179.
بانوئی، علی اصغر؛ مهاجری، پریسا؛ جوادی، کوروش؛ جهانفر، نیلوفر؛ خالقی، پگاه و حسینی، سید محمد امین. (۱۳۹۸)، «نقش و اهمیت اقتصادی و اجتماعی صندوق بازنشستگی کشوری در قالب ماتریس حسابداری اجتماعی»، طرح پژوهشی، مؤسسه راهبردهای بازنشستگی صبا.
خندان، عباس. (1394)، «تأمین مالی مستمری بازنشستگی در ایران: چالش‌ها و راهکارهای اصلاحی»، فصلنامه تأمین اجتماعی، سال سیزدهم، شماره ۴۶: 53-72.
گریفین، کیت و مک کنلی، تری. (1377)، توسعه انسانی: دیدگاه و راهبرد، ترجمه: غلامرضا خواجه‌پور، تهران، انتشارات مرداد.

Blancas, Andres. (2006). "Interinstitutional Linkage Analysis: A Social Accounting Matrix Multiplier Approach for the Mexican Economy." Economic System Research, 18(1), 29-60.
Debowics, Dario. (2016). “A Social Accounting Matrix for Iraq.” Journal of Economic Structure, 27(2), 1-19.
European Commission, Leadership Group SAM. (2003). Handbook of Social Accounting Matrix and labour Accounts, Population and Social Conditions. Luxemburg.
Ghosh, Ambica. (1958). “Input-Output Approach in and Allocation System.” Economica, 25(97), 58-64.
Gurgul, Henryk, and Majdosz, Pawel. (2006). “Interfund Linkage Analysis: the Case of the Polish Pension Fund Sector.” Economic Systems Research, 18(1), 1-27
Johnson, Robert. (2014). “Five Facts about Value-Added Exports and Implications for Macroeconomics and Trade Research.” Journal of Economic Perspective, 28(2), 112-119.
Johnson, Robert, and Noguera, Guillermo. (2012). “Accounting for intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value-Added.” Journal of International Economics, 86 (2), 224-236.
Keuning, Steven. (1989). “International between National Accounts and Socio-Economic Policy.” Review of Income and Wealth, 44(4), 331-369.
Keuning, Steven. (1996). Accounting for Economic Development and Social Change. IOs Press, Amsterdam.
Keuning, Steven. (2018). Evaluating Multidimensional Inequality within a Social Accounting Framework. Central Bureau Statistics, The Netherlands.
Koopman, Robert., Wang, Zhi., and Wei, Shang-Jin. (2014). “Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports.” American Economic Review, 104(2), 459-494.
Los, Bart. Timmer, Marcel.P., and de Vries, Gaaitzen.J (2016). “Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports: Comments.” American Economic Review, 106 (7), 1958-66.
Malan, Aneme. (2000). “Changes in Income Distribution in South Africa, a Social Accounting Matrix Approach.” 13th International Conference on Input-Output Technique, Italy.
Miller, Ronald.E. and Blair, Peter.D. (2009). Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Cambridge University
Oosterhaven, Jan. (1996). “Leontief versus Ghoshian Price and Quantity Models.” Southern Economic Association, 62(3), 750-759.
Oosterhaven, Jan. (2019). Rethinking Input- Output Analysis: A Spatial Perspective, Springer Publication
Pyatt, Graham. (1973). “Methodology for Macroeconomic Projection.” Technical Report No.12, International Labour Office.
Pyatt, Graham. (2001). “Some Early Multiplier Models of the Relationship between Income Distribution and Production Structure.” Economic Systems Research, 13(2), 139-164.
Pyatt, Graham., and Round, Jeffrey. (1977). Social Accounting for Development Planning with Special Reference to Sri Lanka. Cambridge; Cambridge University
Pyatt, Graham. (2003). “An Alternative Approach to Poverty Analysis.” Economic Systems Research, 4(2), 113-134.
Round, Jeffrey. (2003). “Constructing SAMs for Development Policy Analysis: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead.” Economic Systems Research, 25(2), 161-184.
Ruggles, Ruggles. (1990). “A note on the Revision of the United Nations System of National Accounts.” Review of Income and Wealth, 36(4), 413-420.
Ruggles, Ruggles. and Ruggles, Nancy.D. (1986). “The Integration of Macro and Micro Data for Household Sector, Review of Income and Wealth.” 32 (3), 245-276.
Saari, Yusof. M., Dietzenbacher, Erik., and Los, Bart. (2014). “Income Distribution across Ethic Group in Malaysia, Results from a new Social Accounting Matrix.” Asian Economic Journal, 28(2), 259-278.
Saari, Yusof.M., Dietzenbacher, Erik., and Los, Bart. (2015). “Source of Income Growth and Inequality across Ethic groups of Malaysia, 1970-2000.” World Development, 76(3), 311-328.
Seers, Dudley. (1977). “What We Are Trying to Measure?” The Journal of Development Studies, 8(3), 21-36.
Seers, Dudley. (1979). “The Birth, Life and Death of Development Economics.” Development and Change, 10(2), 707-719.
Sen, Amartya. (1983). “Development Which Way Now?” Economic Journal, 93(4), 365-380.
Sen, Amartya. (1986). On Ethics and Economics, Rager Lectures, University of California.
Stiglitz, Joseph., Sen, Amartya. and Fitoussi, Jean-Paul. (2009). Report by the Commission and Measurement of the Economic Performance, Available https://www.economie.gouv.fr/files/finances/presse/dossiers_de_presse/090914mesure_perf_eco_progres_social/synthese_ang.pdf
United Nations (2009). Systems of National Accounts, New York.
Van, de Van (2017). “Present and Future Changes to the System of National Accounts: Linking Micro and Macro.” Review of Income and Wealth, 45(92), 1-21.
Vanoli, Andre. (2014). “National Accounting at the Beginning of the 21th Century: where From? Where to?” Eurostat Review on National Accounts and Macroeconomic Indicator, No.1, 9-38.