Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. candidate

2 Faculty Member

Abstract

Although poverty is a common phenomenon, no group suffers as much from the negative effects of poverty as children. The main question of the article is to ascertain whether the experience of poverty differs between girls and boys? In this article, an ethnographic method is used to collect information from 30 children (16 girls and 14 boys) aged 10 to 17 who have experienced a life of poverty. Data analysis was performed using conventional qualitative content analysis. Findings show that girls and boys experience similar and different experiences of poverty at the same time. While the lack of clothing, housing, and food is similarly experienced and perceived by girls and boys, the fact that girls work at home, their lack of access to public space becomes extra challenges for them. Prolonged stay at home makes access to private space at home more important for girls. On the other hand, the division of gender labor in early childhood is strictly applied to girls and boys in poor families. As boys gain access to money, the resources available to them inside and outside the home increase, but waged labor from an early age increases the physical and psychological stress for boys. A better understanding of child poverty due to gender characteristics can lead to more effective welfare and protection policies.

Keywords

  • Andresen, S., & Meiland, S. (2019). Being poor from children’s point of view. The potential of childhood theory and qualitative methods for child poverty research: Findings from two qualitative studies of poverty in Germany. Children and Youth Services Review, 97(July), 94–99.
  • Atter, Pamela. (2006). The social cost of poverty: A systematic Review of the Qualitative Evidence.Children and society, 20(6/12), 54-66.
  • Bradshow, Adamson, J orcid. (2007). Child Poverty in Perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries. Research Report. Innocenti Report Card, vol. 7. Unicef Innocenti Research Centre, Florence, Italy
  • Chip (2004). Children and poverty – some questions answered. Childhood Poverty Research and Policy Centre, London, UK
  • Christensen, P and Prout, A. (2005). Anthropological and Sociological Perspectives on the study of children. Researching Children’s Experience. London: Sage. 42–60.
  • Desarrollo, fondo. (2004). Understanding poverty from gender perspective. cepal
  • Egan-Bitran, Michelle. (2010). This is how I see it: Children and young Adults views and expreiance of poverty. The Office of the Children’s Commissioner, New Zealand.
  • Harju, A. and Thorod, A. B. (2010) Child Poverty in a Scandinavian Welfare Context –From Children’s Point of View. Published online 20 November. Sprin
  • Horgan, G. (2007a). They are not looking at the cost of living: a study of income adequacy in Northern Ireland. Benefits, 15: 1, 59-63
  • Jakovljevic, Ashley P and Miller, Fitzgerald, B. (2016). Children’s mental health: Is poverty the diagnosis? Medical Journal, vol. 58 no. 8
  • Laderchi, C.R., Saith, R. & Stewart, F. (2003). Everyone agrees we need poverty reduction, but not what this means: does this matter? Paper for WIDER Conference on Inequality, Poverty and Human Well-being, Helsinki, 30-31 May, 2003.
  • Magnuson, k. and Votruba-drazel, E. (2008). Enduring Infuences of childhood poverty, Institue for research of poverty, paper, 348-04
  • Mohan, Erica, and Carolyn M. Shields. (2014). The Voices Behind the Numbers: Understanding the Experiences of Homeless Students.Critical Questions in Education 5, 3: 189-202.
  • Moore, Tim, and Morag McArthur. (2011). Good for Kids: Children Who Have Been Homeless Talk About School.” Australian Journal of Education 55, 2: 147-160.
  • Murphy, Susan. (2015). Glass Ceilings and Iron Bars: Women, Gender and Poverty in the Post-2015 Agenda’, Global Justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric, 8, 74-96.
  • Ridge, T. (2002). Childhood poverty and social exclusions: from a Child’s Perspective. Policy Press: Bristol, UK.
  • Ridge, T. (2006). Listening to children: Developing a child-centred approach to childhood poverty in the UK. Family Matters, 65, 49-80.
  • Shaffer, Paul. (2008). New Thinking on Poverty: Implications for Gloablisation and Povery Reduction Strategies. DESA Working Paper No.65 (New York: UN-DESA) (http://ideas.repec.org/p/une/wpaper/65.html).
  • Shropshire, J, and Middleton, S. (1999). Small expectations: Learning to be poor. York, UK: York Publishing Services.
  • Sutton, L., Smith, N., Dearden, C., & Middleton, S. (2007). A child’s-eye view of social difference: York, UK. Joseph Rowntree Foundation
  • Taylor, J. and Fraser, A. (2003). Eleven Plus: life Chances and Family income, Brotherhood of St Laurence: Melbourne, Australia.
  • Townsend, Peter. (1985). A Sociological Approach to Measurement of Poverty.UK. Oxford EconomicPapers.
  • (2005). Child Poverty Report in all over the world. www.unicef.com
  • (2010). Maesuring child poverty: New league tables of child poverty in the world’s rich countries.

https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/rc10_eng.pdf

  • Vijaya, R., R. Lahoti, and H. Swaminathan. (2014). Moving from the Household to the Individual: Multidimensional Poverty Analysis. World Development, Vol. 59, pp. 70–81.
  • World Bank. (2018). Equality and Development. Washington D.C