Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Department of Sociology, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Sociology, Tehran Research Science Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Popular beliefs, on one hand, can accelerate the process of sustainable development, on the other hand, can prevent it.With these words, it seems necessary to answer this question:"Do popular beliefs help sustainable rural development, or on the contrary, can it be considered as an obstacle?"In the current research, in order to explain the impact of popular beliefs on sustainable rural development, thirty-four parts of the documentary collection of the villages of South Khorasan province,which examines the economic status, employment and agricultural products of that province, in thirty villages;By benefiting from Durkheim's theory of social division of labor-with a different view in opposition to the principles of the modernization school in expressing the obstacles to development-it has been investigated.The approach of this qualitative research, the method of gathering information in it, is documentary,as well as the technique used is content analysis.The studies conducted in the villages of this province inform about the significant relationship between popular beliefs and sustainable rural development and each of its dimensions.As a result of the division of societies in Durkheim's theory,it shows the progress of societies and not necessarily the backwardness of primitive societies in the sense of an obstacle to reach any kind of development.
Keywords
Main Subjects
- Herman, Emila. (2012). “Rural employment in the context of Romanian regional development”, Annals of the Constantin Brancusi University of Targu Jiu, Economy Series, Issue 3: 131-140.
- Tudor, Monica. (2012). Rural Human Capital In Romania–Evolutions In Transition. Institute of Agricultural Economics, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Issue 2: 211-232.
- Borec, Andreja, and Turk, Jernej. (2009). “Sustainable Rural Development – Eu AgricalturePerspective”, Revija za geografijo - Journal for Geography, Vol. 4, No. 1: 37-52.
- Chinchanachokchai, Sydney, Siwarit Pongsakornrungsilp, And Theeranuch Pusaksrikit. (2017). “Exploring Different Types of Superstitious Beliefs in Risk-Taking Behaviors”, Social Marketing Quarterly.
- Chigbu, Uchendu Eugene. (2012). “Village Renewal as an Instrument of Rural Development:Evidencefrom Weyarn, Germany”, Community Development, No 43: 209-224.
- Herrmann, S. and Osinski, E, (1999), “Planning sustainable land use model in rural areas atdifferent spatial levels using GIS and modeling tools”, Landscape and Urban Planning 46, Issues1-3: 93-101.
- Mary, Douglas, Barrie & Rockliff. (1970). Natural Symbols: Exploration in Cosmology, London.
- Matthews, K.B., Sibbald, A.R., and Craw, S. (1999). “Optimization algorithm, Computersand Electronics in Agriculture”, No 23: 9-26.
- Peltzer, Karl and Renner,Walter. (2001). Superstition, Risk-taking and Risk perception of accidents among south African taxi drivers.
- Rodrigue, Jean-Paul. (2009). Sustainable Development, Dept. of Global Studies & Geography, Hofstra University.
- Wackernagel, Mathis and Yount, J.D. (2000). Footprints for Sustainability, Vol. 2, No. 1: 23-44.
- Ward, N,. Brown, David L. (2009). Placing the Rural in Regional Development, RegionalStudies, NO 43; 1237–1244.
)