Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of sociology , Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The aim of current research was
Sociological analysis relations between social capital dimension (network, partnership and social trust) with subject welfare in lorestan university .We used two theories Putnam for social capital and composing theory for subject welfare. All of student of lorestan university involed in this study. By using the chockran formula, the sample size of this study was 384 persons. Stratified random sampling (proportional allocation) was used to sampling. With regards to the aim of research, this is a correlational study. For data gathering we used the subject welfare and social capital questionnaires which confirmed its reliability and validity. In this study, designed paths for research suggest model, showed that their hypothesis. Therefore, to investigation of this hypothesis, Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) and inferential statistics (path analysis) by using the SPSS soft ware. The results show that the designed model for this study has the perfect fitting with gathered data. Also the results of fitting model showed that the significant straight paths (straight effects) of social network to subject welfare, social trust to subject welfare and two tailed paths (interactive effects) among social network and social partnership, social network and social trust, social partnership and social trust. In addition, in fitting model only straight path social partnership to subject welfare wasn’t significant so the hypothesis appropriate to this path doesn’t confirmed.

Keywords

Main Subjects

- Addae, Evelyn Aboagye. (2020). “The mediating role of social capital in the relationship between socioeconomic status and adolescent wellbeing evidence from Ghana.” Addae BMC Public Health, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8142-x.
- Alexandrova, anna. (2005). “subjective well-being and kahnemans objective happiness.” jornal of happiness studies, 18, 301-324.
- Bjornskov,.C. (2008). “Social Capital and Happiness in the United States.Applied Research in Quality of Life Journal, 21, 43-62.
- Chen, S., Fan, Y., Cao, Y., & Khattak, A. (2019). “Assessing the relative importance of factors influencing travel happiness.” Travel Behaviour and Society, 16, 185-191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.01.002
- De silva, mery. (2005). context and composition? Social capital and maternal mental healthe in law income countries. thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of philosophy Faculty of Medicine, University of London.
- Diener, E. (2005). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being.
- Fan, X., Deng, N., Dong, X., Lin, Y., & Wang, J. (2019). “Do others’ self-presentation on social media influence individual’s subjective well-being? A moderated mediation model.” Telematics and Informatics, 41, 86-102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.04.001
- Hwang, Li-Ann; Wei Jian Ng, Jason; Vaithilingam, Santha. (2019). “Social
capital and subjective well-be   ing: The mediating role of social networking
sites.” 24, 7-10
- Martínez, L. M., Estrada, D., & Prada, S. I. (2019). “Mental health, interpersonal trust and subjective well-being in a high violence context.” SSM - Population Health, 8, 100423.    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100423
- Miller, Evonne and Buys, Laurie. (2008). “Does social capital predict happiness, health and life satisfaction in an urban Australian community?” Kotuitui: New Zealand: Journal of Social Sciences Online, 3(1), 15-20.
- Putnam, R. (1993). “The Prosperous community: Social Capital and Public Life.” The American Prospect, 14, 35-42.
- Putnam, R. (1995). “Bowling Alone: Americas Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78.
- Requena, felix. (2003). “social capital satisfaction and quality of life the workplace.” social indicators research, 61, 331-360.