Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of Social Sciences. Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences. Shahid Beheshti University. Tehran. Iran

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the impact of mutual interaction between government, market and civil society on reducing economic inequalities. The research is based on the comparative-quantitative method, using secondary data for 100 developing countries from 2000 to 2019. The data analysis was carried out using structural equation modeling and its localization. The results of this research showed that each of the three sides of government, market and civil society has contributed effectively to reducing economic inequality. Market mechanism with increased growth and economic development and increased employment opportunities; Governance mechanism through increased regulation and adjustment measures (including taxation of the rich and welfare allocation) and civil society by expanding channels and forums for the development of rational and reasoned discourses. However, no empirical evidence could be found for the interconnection of the three dimensions mentioned; So that in the East, South and Southeast Asia and Latin America region there are only two dimensions of market and government and in the North Africa, Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa region the two dimensions of market and government civil society were interconnected. In Eastern Europe, none of the poles had any interaction with each other. At the same time, maintaining the independence and mutual influence of the above three dimensions is very important in reducing economic inequality.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  •  

    • Bruni, Luigino & Stefano Zmagni (2016). Civil Economy: Another Idea of the Market. Agenda Publishing Limited.
    • Chancel, Lucas., & et al. (2022). World Inequality Report. Wid.world. https://wir2022.wid.world/.
    • Esping-Anderson, Gosta & Myles, John. (2018). The Welfare State and Redistribution. In "Social Stratification: Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective", Edited by Grusky, David. New York: Routledge.
    • Jessop, B. (2022). Putting Civil Society in its Place. The Policy Press.
    • Lister, A. (2013). The “Mirage” of Social Justice: Hayek Against (and For) Rawls. Critical Review, 25(3-4), 409-444.
    • (2023). Survival of the Richest. https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/621477/bp-survival-of-the-richest-160123-en.pdf.
    • Vallier, K. (2019). Rawls, piketty, and the critique of welfare-state capitalism. Journal of Politics, 81(1), https://doi.org/10.1086/700108
    • Viotti, P. (2008). Who Cares about Inequality? Liberalism and Distributive Justic America. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses; A dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Politics, University of California Santa Cruz.
    • Dabla-Norris, E., Kochhar, K., Suphaphiphat, N., Ricka, F., & Tsounta, E. (2015). Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality: A Global Perspective. Staff Discussion Notes. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513555188.006
    • Gangl, K., Kirchler, E., Lorenz, C., & Torgler, B. (2018). Wealthy Tax Non-Filers in a Developing Nation: The Roles of Taxpayer Knowledge, Perceived Corruption and Service Orientation in Pakistan. In Building Trust in Taxation. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780684734.017.
    • Klie, T. (2009). Civil Society and Social Inequality, in "International Encyclopedia of Civil Society" edited by Anheier, H; Toepler, S & List, R. Springer Publication.
    • Ray, S., & Singh, R. (2022). Do Wealthy Politicians Underreport Their Income? Evidence from General Election Data. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4289312
    • Velez, J.L., & Mahecha, J.A. (2018). Can Wealth Taxation Work in Developing Countries? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Colombia. Job Market Paper. https://www.iipf.org/papers/WealthTaxation_LondonoVelez_JMP.pdf

     

    پایگاه‌های اطلاعاتی:

    http://www.bti-project.org/index/
    http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators
    http://www.humanrightsdata.com/

    http://www.wid.world
    http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/

    http://taxfoundation.org/

    https://www.worldbank.org/en/data/interactive/2019/05/21/worldwide-bureaucracy-indicators-dashboard