Document Type : Research Paper

Abstract

Land use planning is a vital strategy for protecting the integrity of the land and optimal use of the land's (natural and social) talents, which cannot be imagined without a budgeting system based on the environment and environmental dynamics. Therefore, the Land use planning budget has at least four important features, which are: 1) "flexible"; That is, in accordance with the environmental changes and receptive to the principle of natural and social biodiversity and compatible with the biological characteristics of the Iranian plateau. 2) It has "unity" not only in the form and way of presenting the budget document, but it also benefits from the unity resulting from socio-biological continuity and ecological economy. 3) "Transparent" reflects the process of changes in the texture of biological complexes. 4) "Basic participation" is designed and implemented. The main question of the article is: Has the budget bill of 1402 been able to make a financial-technical formulation of the overview and detailing of the changes in biodiversity (natural and social) and the spatial structure of the country? The analysis of the budget bill of 1402 and its comparison with the budget bill of 1401 shows that the budget bill of 1402 is a supporter of restoration through legal, conceptual, operational foundation and reliance on environmental science.

Keywords

Main Subjects

- Lambe Isaac and Maryam Lawal and Theresa Okoli. 2015. A Systematic Review of Budgeting and Budgetary Control in Government Owned Organizations, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, volume 6.pp 1-10, url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55640317}
- Bernaciak, Arnold. 2019. Participatory budgeting – an indicator of social activity of residents and a tool of environmental protection in Poland: spatial diversity in the east/west configuration. Journal Economics and Environment. Vol (69). No 2. doi: 10.34659/2019/2/18
- Allen, R. I., Betley, M., Renteria, C., & Singh, A. (2020). "Chapter 12 Integrating Infrastructure Planning and Budgeting". In Well Spent. USA: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved Sep 9, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513511818.071.ch012
- Gherghina, S.; Tap, P. Ecology Projects and Participatory Budgeting: Enhancing Citizens’ Support. Sustainability. 2021. 13(19), 10561.
      https://doi.org/10.3390/ su131910561
- Schick, Allen. 2008. Budgeting for Fiscal Space. Asian OECD Senior Budget Officials Meeting. Bangkok, Thailand.
- Sgueo, Gianluca. 2016. Participatory budgeting: An innovative approach. European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS). 1-7.
- Schall, Barbara.2019. Plants and people: Our shared history and future, Plants, People, Planet, pp 14– 19.
- Spackman, Michael. 2002. Multi-Year Perspective in Budgeting and Public Investment Planning. OECD, Paris, 24-26 April.
- Hritonenko, Natali. Yatsenko, Yuri. 2013. Mathematical Modeling in Economics, Ecology and the Environment. Springer. ISBN 978-1-4614-9311-2
- Pench, Lucio.2021. Green Budgeting: Towards Common Principles. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2765/51675
- Wang, Xueping and Hu, Shichao. (2022). Can performance-based budgeting reform improve corporate environment in ESG? Evidence from Chinese-listed firms. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:982160. PP: 1-17. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.982160
- Chapman, Jeffrey I. (1998). Land Use Planning and the Local Budget: A Model of Their Interrelationships. Public Administration Review. Vol. 48, No. 4 (Jul. Aug., 1988), pp. 800-806. Published By: Wiley.
       https://doi.org/10.2307/975604
- Healy, Richard W. Winter, Thomas C. LaBaugh, James W and Lehn Franke, O. (2007). Water Budgets: Foundations for Effective Water-Resources and Environmental Management. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
- Jalali, Farzaneh and Gal, Graham. (2019). Can Sustainability Be Budget for? Evidence from Iran. at: https://www.researchgat. 158-178.
          DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-4502-8-7