Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Institute for Cultural and Social Studies
2 Assistant Professor Payame Noor University
Abstract
The Iranian Islamic model of progress in implementation will face significant challenges. Understanding the most important ones and finding scientific and practical solutions for them is the most important steps of the model. This paper is based on Douglas North's institutional theoretical foundations and social order theory and is a descriptive-analytic method. This study shows that resolving the problem of violence and political stability is the most elusive problem of power elite and the issue of implementation, and the role of the power elite, the judiciary, and indigenous solutions in solving these challenges is very important. Japan, South Korea, Malaysia and China have also been surveyed by the World Bank on indicators such as "security of property rights", "control of corruption", "non-violence and political stability" and "protest and accountability" by the World Bank. All of them have had, at the beginning of the process of developing limited political access and authoritarian regimes, instead of democratic strategies, open political access and free markets in the Western way. But their top priority has been economic development, security of productive property rights through voluntary or forced removal of elite power rents and control of corruption. The role of the judiciary and the power elite in addressing the three major problems of restricted access systems (developing countries) is unmatched, and indigenous solutions and institutions are essential to this process.
Keywords
- Omoniyi victor Ajulor. (2018). The challenges of policy implementation in Africa and sustainable development goals, International journal of social sciences, 1497-1518.
- North D and J. Wallis and S. Webb and B.Weingast. (2007). "Limited Access Orders in the Developing World:A New Approach to the Problems of Development ". World Bank Policy Research Paper No.4359 Washington DC.
- North Douglass c Wallis John J and Weingast Barry R. (2006). "A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History" December, NBER. Working Paper Series, No 12795
- North D and J. Wallis and S. Webb and B.Weingast. (2009). "Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual FrameWork for Interpreting Recorded Human History". New York: Cambridge University
- He Li, 2015, The Chinese Model of Development and Its Implications, World Journal Science Research, vol2. No2.p126-138.
- Thompson Mark. (2016). East Asian Authoritarian Modernism: From Meiji Japans "Prussian Path" to Chinas "Singapore Model", Asian International Studies Review, Vol 17 No2. P 125-141.
- Halper, S (2010). The Beijing Consensus: How Chinas authoritarian model will dominate the twenty- first century. New York: Basic Books.
)