Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Asistant Profesor in Social Welfare "allameh tabataba'i"University.
2 PhD student in Social Welfare "allameh tabataba'i"University.
3 Profesor in Social Welfare "allameh tabataba'i"University.
4 Asosiat Profesor in Social Work "allameh tabataba'i"University.
Abstract
This article seeks to answer the question of what was the process of housing reconstruction after the November 2017 earthquake in Sarpol-e Zahab and with what challenges? . The method of the present study was qualitative and was used to analyze information and interviews using thematic analysis. Based on the purposive sampling method as well as the theoretical saturation criterion, in-depth and semi-established interviews were conducted with 35 people born in the earthquake and 15 people with specialization. The findings of this study show that the trainee government is the federal government, uses public resources for personal gain, reconstructs delays and slowness of the process, unsupported promises and does not happen in practice, the bureaucracy governing licensing, Do not believe in heat Bank loans, poverty and sexual inequality, empirical experience and preparation of reconstruction authorities, lack of public participation,, , macroeconomic challenges The country was one of the main challenges of reconstruction after the November 2017 earthquake in the city of Sarpol-e Zahab, which was an incomplete and unfinished physical reconstruction. . Based on the research findings, the use of a comprehensive program for the reconstruction of the area, which includes the physical reconstruction of other social areas, such as paying attention to your needs and empowering vulnerable groups, paying attention to cultural issues and the quality of the urban environment. Necessities are available.
Keywords
- Abdulquadri A; Emlyn W, and Irene L. (2015). "A framework for managing post-disaster housing reconstruction" Edited by Kähkönen Kalle. 8th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization. 318-319.Retrieved.
- from:http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pII/S2212567115001823.
- Akashe B., (2004). To days Ago Rudbar, Bam Yesterday, Tomorrow ..., abstract Conference neighborhood development prospects of sustainable development,Tehran Municipality, Tehran, p. 28.
- Barakat S. (2003). Housing reconstruction after conflict and disaster. Humanitarian Policy Group, Network Papers; 43:1-40.
- Berke PR, Kartez J, Wenger D. (1993) Recovery after disaster: achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. Disasters; 17(2):93-109.
- Davis I, and Alexande D. (2016). Recovery from Disaster. New York, Routledge.
- Davis (1981). disasters and settlements: Oxford.Disaster and the small dwelling, Pergamon press.
- Ganapati NE, and Ganapati S. (2008). Enabling participatory planning after disasters: a case study of the World Bank's housing reconstruction in Turkey. Journal of the American Planning Association; 75(1):41-59.
- Green R, Bates LK, and Smyth A. (2007).Impediments to recovery in New Orleans' upper and lower Ninth Ward: One year after Hurricane Katrina. Disasters. 2007; 31(4):311-35.
- Haas J. E., Kates R W, and Bowden M. J. (1997). Reconstruction Following Disaster. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Available at:rwkates.org/pdfs/b1977.01_CH1.pdf.
- Ismail D, Taksiah A M, Ruhizal R, and Noorazam Ab S. (2014), Project Management Success for Post-Disaster Reconstruction Projects: International NGOs Perspectives, procedia economics and finance,18, 120-127.
- Jha A., Barenstein J., Phelps P., Pittet, D., and Sena, S. (2010). Safer Homes, Stronger Communities. A Handbook for Reconstruction after Natural Disasters. Washington DC: The World Bank.
- Mitchell JK. (2006). The primacy of partnership: Scoping a new national disaster recovery policy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science; 604(1):228-55.
- National Disaster Recovery Framework (NDRF) FEMA. (2011).
- Navidi Majd F, and Andalib A, (2013), Social Issues in Post Disaster Reconstruction Planning, International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development,3(1): 39-44.
- Olshansky RB, Johnson LA, and Horne J, Nee B. (2008). Longer view: Planning for the rebuilding of New Orleans. Journal of the American Planning Association,74(3):273-87.
- Ophiyandri T., Amaratunga D., Pathirage, C, and Keraminiyage, K. (2013). Critical success factors for community-based post-disaster housing reconstruction projects. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environmen,4 (2): 236 – 249.
- Rowland J. (1995). Rebuilding Sarajevo. Disaster prevention and management, 4 (1), 32-37.
- Rubin C. B., Saperstein M. D, and Barbee, D. G. (1985). Community Recovery from a Major Natural Disaster.
- Saghafi Nia M, Nafissi N, Moharamzad Y. (2008). Survey of Bam earthquake survivors' opinions on medical and health systems services. Prehosp Disaster Med, 23(3):263-8.
- Sediqi Z., Coffey V, and Trigunarsyah, B. (2013). Critical factors for successful housing reconstruction projects following a major disaster. InProceedings of the 19th Triennial CIB World Building Congress (pp. 1-12). Queensland University of Technology.
- Sharma K, Apil KC, Subedi M,and Pokharel B. (2018). Post Disaster Reconstruction after 2015 Gorkha Earthquake: Challenges and Influencing Factors, Journal of the Institute of Engineering, 14(1): 52-63.
- Shaw R., Shiwaku K., Kobayashi H, and Kobayashi M. (۲۰۰۴). Linking Preparedness and Earthquake, Diaster management, ۱3(۱): ۳۹-۴۹.
- SKAT and IFRC. (2012). Sustainable reconstruction in Urban Areas, A handbook, Switzerland؛
- Tatsuki S (2007). Long-term life recovery processes among survivors of the 1995 Kobe earthquake: 1999, 2001, 2003, and 2005 Life Recovery Social Survey results. J Disaster Res; 2:484-501.
- Wood J. Anderson P, and Mary B. (۱۹۸۹), rising from the Ashes: Development Strategies in Times of Disaster, Graduate school of education-harvard university-UNESCO.
)