نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
گروه مدیریت پروژه و ساخت، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
چکیده
با گسترش اثرگذاری سازمان ها بر محورهای توسعه پایدار و همچنین رشد آگاهی عمومی، مطالبه از سازمان ها برای مسئولانه عمل کردن در قبال جامعه و حرکت به سمت مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی در عمل شدت گرفته است. در این راستا سازمان ها با آگاهی از عوامل دخیل در موضوع مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکتی و نمود آن در تصمیماتشان، کمک شایانی به اعتبار خود می کنند. به همین دلیل در این مقاله شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر سیاست ها و اقدامات مرتبط با مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکتی در سازمان های مبتنی بر پروژه مورد پژوهش قرار گرفته است. بدین منظور پس از مرور چتری 22 مقاله مروری متمرکز بر موضوع و انجام مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته با خبرگان چهارچوب نظری پژوهش توسعه یافته است و با متد دلفی و ارسال پرسش نامه برای تنی چند از متخصصان، چهارچوب نظری اعتبارسنجی و نهایی شده است. در نتیجه جمعاً 11 عامل در سه سطح شامل 5 عامل روند رشد و توسعه کشور، مناسبات دولت و جامعه، کنش نهادهای رسمی دولتی، کنش نهادهای رسمی غیر دولتی و کنش نهادهای غیر رسمی در سطح نهادی، 4 عامل سیستم حاکمیتی سازمان، مشخصات سازمان، برنامه ریزی سازمان و جهت گیری فرهنگی سازمان در سطح سازمانی و 2 عامل ویژگی های بدنه حاکمیت و ویژگی های منابع انسانی در سطح فردی شناسایی شدند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Identifying variables affecting corporate social responsibility in project-based organizations
نویسندگان [English]
- Mahdieh Dehghan Nayeri
- Mohammad Hossein sobhiyah
Department of Project Management and Construction, College of Art and architecture , Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Demanding for organizations that act responsibly and move towards social responsibility has intensified with the organizations' increasing impact on the components of sustainable development. In this regard, organizations contribute to their credibility by being aware of the factors involved in corporate social responsibility (CSR) and manifesting it in their decisions. In this article, we investigated variables affecting policies and actions related to corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the context of project-based organizations in the country. For this purpose, first, an initial theoretical framework has been developed by reviewing scholarly journal articles and interviewing experts. Then, the theoretical framework has been validated and finalized by sending questionnaires to several experts and the Delphi method. As a result, we identified 11 factors at three institutional, organizational, and individual levels. Five factors at the institutional level include the country's growth and development rate, government-society relationships, the action of formal governmental institutions, the action of formal non-governmental institutions, and the action of informal institutions; four factors at the organizational level include the organization's governance system, organization profile, Organizational planning, and cultural orientation of the organization; and two factors at the individual level include the characteristics of the governing body and the characteristics of human resources.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Corporate social responsibility
- ethical responsibility
- project management
- umbrella review
- Delphi method
- قرا ملکی، احد فرامرز. (1398)، سازمان‌های اخلاقی در کسب‌وکار، قم: نشر مجنون، چاپ سیزدهم.
- Abdulkadir, Umar, and Mohd N. Alifiah. (2020). "Review of related literature on the influence of corporate governance attributes on corporate social responsibility disclosure." Journal of Critical Reviews, 7 (7), 818–822. doi: 10.31838/jcr.07.07.150.
- Aguinis, Herman, and Ante Glavas. (2012). "What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda." Journal of Management, 38 (4), 932–968. doi: 10.1177/0149206311436079.
- Ali, Waris. (2017). "Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing Countries: A Literature Review." Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24 (4), 273–294. doi: 10.1002/csr.1410.
- Aromataris, Edoardo. (2015). "Summarizing Systematic Reviews: Methodological Development, Conduct and Reporting of an Umbrella Review Approach." International journal of evidence-based healthcare, 13 (3), 132–140. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055.
- Carroll, Archie B., and Kareem M. Shabana. (2010). "The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice." International Journal of Management Reviews, 12 (1), 85–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x.
- Eteokleous, Pantelitsa P.. (2016). "Corporate social responsibility in international marketing: review, assessment, and future research." International Marketing Review, 33 (4), 580–624. doi: 10.1108/IMR-04-2014-0120.
- Falagas, Matthew E.. (2008). "Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and Weaknesses." FASEB journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 22 (2), 338–342. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.
- Faller, Christian M., and Dodo zu Knyphausen-Aufseß. (2016). "Does Equity Ownership Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility? A Literature Review of Theories and Recent Empirical Findings." Journal of Business Ethics, 150 (1), 15–40. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3122-x.
- Glavas, Ante. (2016). "Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Psychology: an Integrative Review." Journal of Frontiers in psychology, 7 (Article 144), 1-13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00144.
- Gond, Jean-Pascal. (2017). "The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review." Jornal of Organizational Behavior, 38 (2), 225–246. doi: 10.1002/job.2170.
- Kakabadse, Nada K.. (2005). "Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder approach: a conceptual review." International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1 (4), 277–302. doi: 10.1504/IJBGE.2005.006733.
- Landeta, Jon. (2006). "Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences." Journal of Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73 (5), 467–482. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.002.
- Latapi Agudelo, Mauricio Andrés. (2019). "Drivers that motivate energy companies to be responsible. A systematic literature review of Corporate Social Responsibility in the energy sector." Journal of Cleaner Production, 247 (3), 1-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119094.
- Lee, Min-Dong P.. (2008). "A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead." International Journal of Management Reviews, 10 (1), 53–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00226.x.
- Liu, Zicheng, and Zhiqiang Huang. (2017). "A Study on Institution of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review, Summary and Prospect." American Journal of Industrial and Business, 07 (02), 93–108. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2017.72008.
- Luhmann, Henrike, and Ludwig Theuvsen. (2016). "Corporate Social Responsibility in Agribusiness: Literature Review and Future Research Directions." Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29 (4), 673–696. doi: 10.1007/s10806-016-9620-0.
- Moher, David. (2009). "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement." Annals of Internal Medicine, 151 (4), 264–270. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.
- Nijhof, Andre. (2008). "Partnerships for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts and strategic options." Journal of Management Decision, 46 (1), 152–167. doi: 10.1108/00251740810846798.
- North, Douglass C.. (1993). "Institutions and Credible Commitment." Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 149 (1), 11–23. https: //www.jstor.org/stable/40751576?seq=1.
- Ortiz-Avram, Daniela. (2018). "Exploring the integration of corporate social responsibility into the strategies of small and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic literature review." Journal of Cleaner Production, 201 (5), 254–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.011.
- Rowley, Jennifer, and Frances Slack. (2004). "Conducting a literature review." Journal of Management Research News, 27 (6), 31–39. doi: 10.1108/01409170410784185.
- Schmitz, Jan, and Jan Schrader. (2015). "Corporate social responsibility: A microeconomic review of the literature." Journal of Economic Surveys, 29 (1), 27–45. doi: 10.1111/joes.12043.
- Scott, W. Richard. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Los Angeles: Sage, Fourth edition.
- Stefano, Federica de. (2017). "The HR role in corporate social responsibility and sustainability: A boundary-shifting literature review." Journal of Human Resource Management, 57 (2), 549–566. doi: 10.1002/hrm.21870.
- Torres, Andrea. (2018). "Umbrella and Systematic Review Methodology to Support the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee." Journal of physical activity & health, 15 (11), 805–810. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0372.
- Tranfield, David. (2003). "Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review." British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–22. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375.
- Turyakira, Peter, K. (2017). "Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) engagement in corporate social responsibility (CSR) in developing countries: Literature review." African Jornal of Business Management, 11 (18), 464–469. doi: 10.5897/AJBM2017.8312.
- Vázquez-Carrasco, Rosario, and M. E. López-Pérez. (2012). "Small & medium-sized enterprises and Corporate Social Responsibility: a systematic review of the literature." Journal of Quality & Quantity, 47 (6), 3205–3218. doi: 10.1007/s11135-012-9713-4.
- Velte, Patrick. (2019). "Do CEO incentives and characteristics influence corporate social responsibility (CSR) and vice versa? A literature review." Social Responsibility Journal, 16 (8), 1293–1323. doi: 10.1108/SRJ-04-2019-0145.
- Velte, Patrick. (2020). "Determinants and consequences of corporate social responsibility assurance: a systematic review of archival research." Journal of Society and Business Review, 16 (1), 1–25. doi: 10.1108/SBR-05-2020-0077.
- Velte, Patrick, and Martin Stawinoga. (2017). “Empirical research on corporate social responsibility assurance (CSRA): A literature review." Journal of Business Economics, 87 (8), 1017–1066. doi: 10.1007/s11573-016-0844-2.
- Vieira, Elizabeth S., and José A. N. F. Gomes. (2009). "A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university." Journal of Scientometrics, 81 (2), 587–600. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-2178-0.
- Vo, Linh Chi. (2011). "Corporate social responsibility and SMEs: a literature review and agenda for future research." Jornal of Problems and Perspectives in Management, 9 (4), 89–97.
https: //www.businessperspectives.org/index.php/journals/problems-and-perspectives-in-management/issue-33/corporate-social-responsibility-and-smes-a-literature-review-and-agenda-for-future-research.
- Voegtlin, Christian, and Michelle Greenwood. (2016). "Corporate social responsibility and human resource management: A systematic review and conceptual analysis." Journal of Human Resource Management Review, 26 (3), 181–197. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.12.003.
- Xiao, Yu, and Maria Watson. (2019). "Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review." Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39 (1), 93–112. doi: 10.1177/0739456X17723971.
Zhang, Qian. (2019). "Drivers, motivations, and barriers to the implementation of corporate social responsibility practices by construction enterprises: A review." Journal of Cleaner Production, 210 (2), 563–584. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.050.
)